Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Texas Gus's avatar

Stephen, I feel that Phillies rotation is stout and won’t let the team drown in the second half. However, their aging lineup may lose steam or break down. Conversely, the Mets stout lineup (expecting production corrections from Vientos and Alvarez) won’t let the team drown but their suspect pitching rotation may lose steam or break down. My point: these teams are pretty even and should go down to the wire.

For the Mets to put their nose ahead, they don’t need a bat, they need an ace. An ace will team up with Senga, Manaea, Peterson, Montas, and however starts of Holmes are left for the season and push everyone down a spot. Now the Mets rotation is stout too.

- for those that will question the “production corrections” referenced above, all you can do is put the players out there to do their job. If they don’t, it’s on them. You can trade for a stud and they have a slump, or get injured. Nothing is for sure. I look ahead, not back.

Expand full comment
Dawid Wechter's avatar

Good post! I remember speaking of the Armstrong trade —a unrelated conversation back in ’21—something like, “Can a reliever be effective with just a fastball?” (Trevor May).

It got me thinking again about the Mets’ 2006 loss to the Cardinals. The bullpen workload that year was massive. So I did a quick look at this season’s first half:

How many innings have 2025 Phillies pitchers with sub-3.00 ERAs thrown? I think it’s close to 450. The Mets? Somewhere in the mid-200s.

What does that mean for the three Mets starters who were injured but are now healthy? Honestly, I don’t know. I was just poking around.

But it’s one reason I’m still not sold on trading a top-10 Mets prospect this month.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts