Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian Joura's avatar

Thanks for doing this, John. I know how hard this piece is to do and then after you spend all of the time on it, everyone nitpicks the grades.

So, here are my nitpicks...

Alonso was an A+ thru the first 36 games and 160 PA of the season. Since then, he has a .772 OPS in 263 PA. That's not as good as Nimmo's year-long production and you gave him a B-. My opinion is that Alonso should get a B+

Mauricio started off 0-8 but since then has a .784 OPS - or more productive than Alonso. And his fielding is better than you describe. Given that very few expected him to be in the majors at this point - remember he was supposed to get 250 PA in the minors after missing all of last year - I feel like this is possible "A" territory, more likely a B+

Expand full comment
Steven Shrager's avatar

Nice job Brian and agree with nearly all your choices, even the grade for Alonso, who carried this team through the beginning part of the season. I'd have given Torrens a C since he has done a great job defensively which is what you want from a strong backup. The problem with backups starting in the lineup on a regular basis is that you learn quickly why they are generally slated to be backups. I would give Stearns a B+ only because if we had not been going down the pitcher reclamation route perhaps they would still be in first place by a nice margin. I'd give the Mets 360 group a grade of A++ because we are worth it.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts