Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charlie Hangley's avatar

Can’t argue a single syllable of this. IOW, everybody complaining about signing A.J. Minter & not Tanner Scott, pipe down. LOL

Expand full comment
Ryan J's avatar

If the plan was to just try to outspend the Dodgers then that's not sustainable long term. On paper, the Dodgers are way better than everyone else, but the beauty of baseball, as Brian pointed out, is that you can win 111 regular season games and still not come away with the championship.

The Mets have to find their own formula for success. It may not look like signing every shiney free agent out there (Soto aside). It may mean passing on the likes of Fried and Burnes in favor of guys with upside. We all saw how quickly Stearns was willing to pivot from players that didn't work out...but imagine we were paying one of those guys $20 M a year for the next 5 years and we felt stuck with them. I prefer the ability to cut a guy loose and search for a replacement.

Are the Mets as good as the Dodgers? No. The Mets just need to be good enough to reach the playoffs. Then the chips are on the table and anything can happen.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts