Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AgingBull's avatar

Strong column, Brian. Your job is much like the columnists, without the access and supporting infrastructure. You need to put out fresh content constantly. This site’s audience will not tolerate the rehash/reposts that so many other Mets site do. You and the M360 contributors (whether bylined or not - looking at you Metsense, Chris F, and Gus and others) deliver on this every day. So thank you for what you do.

I had to chuckle reading your observation about the missed pun opportunity with the Madrigal signing. OMG, someone could have topped the charts with a lyrical pun.

Expand full comment
Bill Austin's avatar

Brian, I agree with Bull - great job finding fresh content.

I took interest in your points about the hitting with runners in scoring position. I have done a bunch of research and math on that that specific point for both individual hitters and the team as a whole, going beyond the OPS to come up with a 'Runs Produced Ratio'. I am still not sure what a gold standard is - it appears that if you can score 20% of the runners you get in scoring position, that is pretty top of the heap. The Mets in 2024 scored 17.8% of all runners that got to second while the D-backs scored 20.1% of them. The Dodgers scored 18.7% of their runners in scoring position with a slightly lower OPS of .790 (than the Mets .809).

One place the Mets can improve is their hitting with runners on third base. While the OPS with runners in scoring position is a not bad .809, it is buoyed by a very high .871 with runners on first and second only and also .837 with a runner only on second base. With a runner only on third base, their OPS fell to .722 and an even lower .716 with runners on 2nd and 3rd with first base being open. With runners on first and third they were at .753, and with the bases flooded, the OPS was at .744. The major OPS damage they did with RISP was without a guy on third.

Just a point of comparison, the D-backs scored 27.5% of their runners from third - the Mets 21.7%.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts